The E-Mail You
Save Can Be Held Against You By Kim Komando Reprinted with permission from the
Microsoft Small Business Center
When it comes to e-mail, I'm a packrat. No, it is
not true that I still have the first e-mail I ever received.
But I probably have my first e-mail from the year 2000. In
fact, I probably have all my e-mails from the year 2000. So of
course, I have everything since then, too.
Why do I have all
this stuff? I'm not sure, frankly. Maybe I was concerned that
I would be sued over some imaginary transgression and would
need an e-trail to prove my innocence. Or maybe I was vaguely
concerned about some legal requirement to save this stuff.
I'm not the only
one doing this. Some of you have thousands of e-mails, too.
And you probably don't know why you're saving them, either.
Maybe you're worried about going to jail over some stupid
e-mail you can't find.
I'm hardly an
expert in what e-mail documents and records to save. So I
talked to Donald Skupsky, the president of Information
Requirements Clearinghouse. He modestly describes himself as
the world's leading expert in this area. I also talked with
Charles Fine, a Phoenix attorney.
Here are some
things to consider when you wonder whether or not to save
e-mail, particularly in light of the federal Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, which imposes more requirements on mostly public
companies to preserve records. Obviously, if you still have
questions, talk to a lawyer.
1. Save important
records. But e-mail is not always considered a record.
Companies should save records of business transactions. If you
sign a contract, save that contract. If you receive the
contract as an attachment to an e-mail, and the other party
says in the e-mail, "We accept the contract," save the e-mail
too. That constitutes a record. So if you would keep it as a
paper document, keep the e-mail. Otherwise, pitch it. That
includes e-mails generated during the contract process. This
is work-in-progress material, and does not reflect the
thinking of an organization. Rather, they are the thoughts of
individuals. When you do keep something, store it formally.
Don't leave it in your e-mail program where no one can find
it. You might be best off to print it and put it in a folder.
2. Sometimes, keep
more. There are certain times in which you cannot discard
things. For instance, if you are part of a legal process, you
can't delete anything that is relevant. I'd err on the side of
caution. Better yet, follow your lawyer's advice. Even if you
are not currently in a legal process, there are two other
important words: imminent and foreseeable. If you're on notice
that you'll be indicted, things are imminent. Now is not a
good time to clean out your e-mails. If you make a big boo-boo
and somebody gets hurt, a lawsuit is foreseeable. Again, be
careful. Talk to your lawyer. According to Skupsky, only the
securities industry is required to keep all of its e-mails.
But the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has added considerably to the
record-keeping burden of some companies — mostly public
companies or companies who do business with public companies.
Again, if you think you may be affected by Sarbanes-Oxley, see
your lawyer.
3. But don't keep
everything. Most likely, those e-mails piling up probably
won't hurt anything (except your server space). Most of us get
into business because we see an unanswered need. We want to
help our customers. We've never been sued, and never expect to
be. However, it could very well happen. Let's say that, after
exercising superhuman patience, you fire Joe Screwup. You
could not have treated Screwup better, but, of course, he
doesn't see it that way. So Screwup sues. You're not worried.
But then you get a subpoena, ordering you to submit any e-mail
from the past three years that bears on the case. There's
nothing in the e-mail that would affect the case, and Screwup
knows it. But you'll have to dig up everything you have, and
your lawyer will go through it, looking for relevant material.
How many hours, at $200 per hour, will it take her to do that?
So you swallow hard and give Screwup $15,000 to go away. You
may never have thought about this, but you can bet that the
plaintiffs' bar has. Worse, maybe they find an e-mail in which
you express intemperate remarks. The e-mail was probably
meaningless, but Screwup's attorney will make you look like
Adolf Hitler. Given the potential problems, why save e-mail?
Sure, this scenario is pretty unlikely. But 99.9% of your old
e-mail is junk, anyway. Why take the risk?
4. Develop a policy
on e-mail retention. Skupsky recommends a personal 30-day
deadline for taking action. After 30 days, your employees (and
you) have to decide if an e-mail is a record. If not, it goes.
This has the salutary effect of forcing your employees to
think about what a record is, and is not. Attorney Chuck Fine
thinks that's a good idea. But he goes further, and chucks (no
pun intended) his e-mail immediately. Don't back up your
e-mail. This is no different than keeping it on your computer.
If you're subpoenaed, you and your lawyer will have to go
through it, whether it's on the computer or on tape. Delete
the old stuff. According to Skupsky, old e-mail is rarely
useful to the other side. But if it costs $50,000 to go
through it, the plaintiff doesn't care. Neither does his
lawyer. They have nothing to lose. Discovery is a wonderful
weapon to force a settlement. So I'm cleaning out my old
e-mails. No, really! It's difficult, though. I've had them so
long, they're like old pals. You should clean out yours, too.
We have to be strong about this.
|